Marxist Theory of Crime

Using the material from item A and elsewhere assess the usefulness of loss approaches to an understanding of horror and deviance. (21 marks) bolshie approaches domiciliate be useful to help us understand crime and deviance. Marxists theory adopts the tenet that the ruling class is responsible for societies. They judge crime is transcriptionatically generated by the social organization of capitalist parliamentary law. Marxists believe that society is sh ared into ii classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.The bourgeoisie push determine such as individuation and competition, and some may argue that it is these values that promote crime amongst the typical offenders, the proletariat. traditionalistic Marxism attempts to explain the relationship in the midst of the two aforementioned classes, with writers such as William Chambliss net that the best way to understand crime and deviance is to analyse the process by which the ruling class exploit their subordinates , by way of means such as the media , ideology and false-class consciousness, to name a few mediums.An shell of this, again the ending of a translate conducted by Chambliss. Marxist say that the flush and powerful decide what is considered deviant and immoral in society to suit their testify needs and have-to doe withs. This supports item A as it states a set of rules laid agglomerate by the state in the interest of the ruling class. This is reflected in crime statistics the nigh common offenders are young, black males between the ages of 15-21. A counter argument to this is the approximation of Strain Theory developed by Robert Merton.Traditional Marxism argues that it is increased aggression and individualistic temper of the capitalist society that inspires individuals to ease up crime, heretofore Merton comments that it is Strain between goals and the legitimate means to achieve these goals that draw an individual to commit crime. It is excessively noned that the Traditional Marxist theory only looks at the cause of crime, and not the effect that the crime has on the society. Another sociological theory that attempts to interpret an explanation for crime and deviance is the Marxist subcultural theory.This Marxist theory of crime goes on to explain it is the emergence of youth subculture that result in crime. It is argued that only the groups on the margins of society are the few that are not bound by the ideology and scotch importance of the ruling class, and collectible to this right, they are able to somewhat rule out the influence of the capitalist society. The largest group which flourish this protection are typically the on the job(p) class youth.According to Brake, amongst other writers, the resistance which is provided by the works class youth is denotative through youth subcultures. A subculture is delimit as a group deep down a society who adopt alternate(a) norms and values to mainstream society. The youth part of these subcultures go out wear different, or rather thoroughgoing clothing compared to mainstream society, and their language, among other attitudes and formalities, will memorialize a contempt for the capitalist system of which they are on the fringes of.It is also verbalise by Brake, that this resistance is supernatural, magical in the sense that this resistance does zippo to solve the problems that are experienced by the youth subcultures, but it still continues, because for each one generation, it is said that the capitalist society produces grand wealth inequalities and opportunities, said by Althusser. Stan Cohen, on the other noted that this analysis of working class youth subcultures are establish on analysis, and as such, are biased, due to these writers looking to prove that subcultures are a direct attack on the capitalist society.A criticism that Cohen provided is that there are many ways in which an individual erect interpret the actions of a subculture, the Marxist observe on this just so happens to be one of the many views in circulation. Blackman also notes that the concentration on youth subcultures and resistance ignores the fact that many subcultures are organise with an emphasis on, gender, sexuality, and also intelligence.Youth subcultures outlive everywhere, in also institutions, for example in education. There are some who specifically desire to adhere to the rules of the education, and follow counsellor as they are given, and there are those who wish to resist because they find schoolwork autonomous, (the earoles and the lads ), which is taken from the interpretivist view of education.